hiphop-elements.com

i thought it would be cool if we had our own research team ... for every valid topic in the knowledge forum that is basically un answered or debated for too long... would be researched by a team of people who once and for all solve and answer every unanswered question.... the official hhe research team...... just a suggestion... whitemike may be able to take this somewhere with a couple of others.

I like this idea... it will deffinately be hard to get alot of us to come to a final agreement.. since all of us that are active.. have very different perspectives...(you probably being very aware..)

however, if we can all agree on a specific method or equation...(unless if we agree on a democratic way...) for concluding a final "answer" or decision/opinion.. than this idea is deffinately good.............even if we cant... i still think its a good idea simply put that we will deffinately be furthering our knowledge/opinion strategies, individually, if anything.

I deffinately would like to be involved. Since it is your idea, take the limelight... and elaborate a bit on what you have in mind.


(I also wanted to mention that in a few months I will be starting my own Website/Forum. For some reason, with this idea that you have, you inspire an idea, where the active participants of the "knowledge corner", can choose their topics, and mod their own forum's on the site........and we all come together to get more people to join. I figure this way, everyone can hone in on their specific areas of interests, and really start motivating the online community.....this is still an idea in progress... however, if it moves forward in the way it should, I think your idea would be perfect, you can head it.)

as a clock ticks,if one of the grooves are misplaced or broken , the clock will not function correctly, and it is this example that sets the difference between a successful or unsuccessful movement. so therefor each person must be employed to the specifics of their skill. debates would even take place between the "crew" which would only be natural .... but the conclusion i guess must be agreed upon as a whole. i don't think it would be too hard to do this..... 1nesol would be a great addition

Alright, lets do it.

We need an order of operations... a policy. Why? To keep us from chaos, and it will allow us to methodically get to the conclusion......unbiasly.

true , we also need ...people ...l0l ..... you may know a couple .....send some messages or so..... i will get at 1ne see if he is down.... though he seems to be a very busy guy.....

and about your site, good luck ,and i would be more than happy to be a part of it..... peace

pertaining to actual recorded fact we should have no differing arguments, as and example, what if the question is answered with "the best of our knowledge" type of attitude, and what we don't know or can't agree up on we call it A "possibility" so we would write the answer to anything answering it to the best of our knowledge by combination and research. what we can't agree up on will be suggested to the reader only as a "possibility". leaving us a wider chance to express our veiws and perspectives thus broadening the mind of the reader. all possibilities should be listed after and seperate from the actual answer......... this is just a suggestion..... no bias should pass that arrangement. but then again this is only a precalculated asumption

I don't believe in research. I believe in a thing called love.

yeah, but i don't roll like that doug , no homo.... but you can feel free to start a "h.h.e. love team" if you want man

lol...

i suck at research,,...

maybe so, but research can be found within knowledge also, and also in perspective, using these two things you can find out alot....... and you have time and time again proven to have these things.... i am sure given a subject with two or more simular people discussing the matter... the final response will be detailed and acurate. making it a successful movement.

No homo? Nigga, if you don't believe in love then you don't believe in God. If you don't believe in God then you don't believe in yourself. Knowledge that.

damn doug, it was a joke .......chillax like them canadians say........

They shouldn't say that.

lol, ok then , go to canada and tell they ass that shit.........

I ain't trying to go nowhere where mufuckers walk around telling people to "chillax."

I think it's quite funny myself, but what does it matter what comes out of a hoes mouth ,as long as she uses it in a expert manner for other purposes ,if you know what i mean..... as for canada, it's cool man,,, i rocked this one spot called club 108 , when i was done, i was aproached by some big black thug lookin' mafucka's only for them to tell me "that was a really great performance" shook my hand , and then turned to his friend as his friend said " excellent performance my friend." or some white sounding shit like that. and then this polish girl who's name is moKica grabbed my hand and escorted me through the crowd. and then................... i met monika with a K, she left her boyfriend ,found out anomaly was gay (no homo) ....i'm high as fuck man ...oh well let me chillax and get back to work Ayyyyyyyy.

My business partners say I am an asshole (bcuz most geniuses are), however I am very good at being the devil's advocate bcuz for a long time I played in his yard, and I have a deep belief in the Commandments and in Yeshua, and believe that that commitment to obedience and faith makes sure the movement ain't in vain; like most of the movements of the past. Depending on the kind of endeavors 'you' decide to undertake, I am willing...

Considering the mess the United States of America is in, should its believers employ the Declaration of Independence to establish a nation ruled by the 10 Commandments, and should it be done?

thanks, and to be honest your question is a good one but it is one that can only be answered by an opinion, and not actual fact. but then a scientical examination could maybe better explain the outcome of such a situation, tying religion with politics has always been thought to be a hazardous activity. well not in man's younger existance. in my "OPINION" ruling a nation or the world by a religion is a step back, because isn't this where most goverments and churches gained their power? and most wars have been fought. over belief systems. people hate people who believe differently simply because they are stereotyped to do so. so attempting to basically place everyone in or under the same belief system will cause a great deal of problems, and also give certain people more power than they have at the moment, and they have more than enough .

rofl.


On a side note... lets not let this idea go to waste..I for one,

vote: Yes.

I feel what MADDMAN is saying, and agree with him on the side of Churches gaining to much power through governmental ties... how ever, at the same tip... I believe that it is vise versa as well.

Church and religion are of the same origin..

however Faith and Truth are completely different...................and again, what you believe is Truth, will cause just as many problems... as you see this in ANYTHING you do i.e. : "I think its ok to eat animals... so your stupid if you think that its not.."

On the fourth dimension of this "flip-side" (drawing back memories to that over the top 10'th dimension post..) :

Any implimentation of Yeshua's teachings.....cant really cause anything but peace, and tolerance. Since Yeshua said, "If someone believes its wrong to eat meat... than dont eat it around them.." than the teachings of Yeshua are to enforce tolerance of others, yet strict obediance and discipline in ones self... hence the reason of the: "Those without sin, cast the first stone.." quote... and even greater of a statement.."You reap what you sow."

Thats why the Teachings of Yeshua are not a "religion.." (although the word religion is very vague, and can also mean watching the "Golden Girls.." or whatever, every night at 6:30pm... Eastern Standard time..) But are religiously practiced.....like you religiously go to work, or school, or eat dinner after 5.. WHATEVER..

This is why Yeshua's teachings, are referred to as a relationship, because of the internal conflicts/blessings/enlightenments one recieves, its between you and God, but they are not to be pushed on to others..........as it pushes others away.............this is why in following Yeshua's teachings, you are to practice the wisdom found in the Tanakh.. to know when to keep your mouth shut.. and people further recieve enlightenment through Yeshuas teachings, like how to lead by example.. through planting seeds.

If the 10 Commandments were applied to the laws............as they kind of are to an extent (its illegal to murder, steal, commit adultery..) Than one would ultimately become more free, simply because of the individualistic nature of what people have titled "Christianity." In the reality of what I am talking about... there is no Christianity in titlement, other than those that practice a man made religion with a name, like all other manmade religions.


To each his own, and we are all left with free will... aside from the unregulatable few Commandments that are given (Love the Lord your God with all your Heart Mind and Soul.... Love thy neighbor...keep the Sabbath holy..etc..) but like I said, you CANNOT REGULATE THEM, WITHOUT BREAKING OTHERS.

Like I said, aside from the physical laws (of murder, adultery, and stealing..) all of the others are internal.