Posted By: skii
Date: Fri, May 16, 2008 08:18:28 PDT
http://www.babyscholars.com/dressupclothes.html

I think it's intresting that Beyonce is attacked for her ad, when there is nothing sexual about the actula clothes. The accesories yes, but the same boas, and feathered "jeweled" heels can be found in any toy store because that's what little girls have played with for generations. No matter what, little girls look up to their mothers and older women and want to be like them. Heck we encourage it by giving them "life like"baby dolls to practice "momming" with when they are toddlers, and complain they grow up to fast? Obviously nobody expects you to let you kids walk out the house like this, if you do it shows obvious problems with your judgement. In this ad, the little girls are obviously just playing around. They just have higher quality dress up accesories. And yes professionals did their makeup. Do you think little girls want to look like clowns? Obviously the children are models (whole nother issue guys), they know how to really use makeup. The overt sexuality in this ad is there because you want it to be. Please tell me what's sexual about a little girl playing a piano. Or the ones behind her pretending to be in a band, or sitting in a chair (just like kids do), or even just posing to take a picture. what was she supposed to do? If they didn't pose, they wouldn't be modeling.

Posted By: Liberty
Date: Wed, May 14, 2008 02:28:09 PDT
Let's hope that she isn't planning on having a pre-teen tramp line to encourage Pervs from their wishes coming true. Come On- do little girls SERIOUSLY need to dress like hookers or Paris Hilton (Sorry, there isn't a difference in that example) But still- I see the first picture of a little girl wearing HEELS! GHETTO Babies should be what the line of clothing should be called! That is just Tacky!